Case Study: Protecting the Guilty

Managing mass confrontation situations can be especially difficult, depending on the nature of incident that triggered it.  Of course, we try to manage a game appropriately to avoid mass confrontation whenever we can.

Sometimes, however, players have different ideas.

When mass conformation happens, one of the most effective tools for quelling it quickly can seem quite counterintuitive: protect the guilty.

Identifying the player that started the incident, then moving to insert yourself near him, and then isolating him (or her) from the rest of the players can be a very effective way to put out the fire.

Of course, one must be “street smart” in these situations in order to determine when it is safe to do so.  Putting yourself potentially in harm’s way can sometimes lead to, well, harm.  This type of judgment comes from experience and some knowledge of the players.

In the video clip below, FIFA and Select Group veteran Martin Atkinson uses the technique perfectly to defuse a situation that popped up in an otherwise well disciplined match.

Again, keep in mind that Premier League players are professionals and, despite plenty of foul language that would seem to indicate otherwise, have a healthy respect for referees (or at least a healthy fear of punishment from the FA).  So, Atkinson can insert himself in this situation reasonably assured that he isn’t going to get punched in the nose by a wayward haymaker.  This might not be in the case your competitions, so, use this approach with appropriate discretion.

P.S.: A referee friend of mine is not a fan of “offsetting cautions” (this is a reference to American football where simultaneous penalties to each side are referred to as “offsetting” because neither penalty is enforced), but I think it is warranted in this case, as there are two very clear and separate cases of misconduct by each of the players.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Case Study: Protecting the Guilty

  1. Should have been a red card, with perhaps a yellow for Noble, but that behavior should not be tolerated. The fact the offending team had two close fouls would lead me to inly giving the one red card.

    Like

  2. Did not see how the second yellow was called for- but was accepted gracefully so perhaps well served. The first offense unclassy.

    Like

  3. Red card? Anyone believing that a red card should have been shown and the player sent off needs to get himself to a clinic or course fast. The Referee sensed something was up because he allowed a perceived foul moments before which is why he is “there” so quickly. Noble just doesn’t push the offender. He continues to challenge him in an effort to get him to fight. That aggressiveness deserves a caution, as well as, the challenge that started to pushing and shoving.The Referee is partly at fault for not recognizing the action that apparently upset Aguero moments before.

    Although this may be a good example as to one way to manage mass confrontation, it is an even better one for keeping things simple. The Referee misreads the game and then manages the misconduct as a FIFA official should.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s